Aim:

    To identify outcome indicator(s) used for monitoring pressure injury prevention

    What did the review find?
    • There were only six countries and nine documents were included that had published information in English and were included in this review.
    • Pressure ulcers were monitored differently across all studies, with three countries (United Kingdom, Australia, and the USA) measuring the outcome using prevalence and incidence, while one country (Canada) using incidence.
    • Two other countries (Belgium and New Zealand) monitors pressure ulcers quality using prevalence only.
    • All studies had used different reporting mechanisms, either through the existing hospital data or notifications.
    • The review found that different countries use different criteria for monitoring pressure injury.

    Full Text can be assessed:

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359228563_Rapid_Evidence_Synthesis_on_Outcome_Indicators_for_Monitoring_of_Pressure_Injury_Prevention

    Search